Re: podlings.xml - field to hold details of non-current podlings

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:06 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> In some cases, a URL might be relevant for retired projects; this
> could be added as an attribute of the <foo> tag

Is it at all possible that a current podling would have a nonstandard URL?

I'm wondering if the URL attribute should be at the podling level,
where it could, if needed, be used for current projects as well as
non-current ones.

Don

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org